Linked Implementation of Set
- Implement the core operations of Set efficiently (linked base).
- Analyze the time/space efficiency of linked implementation.
We want to efficiently implement the Set ADT with an underlying linked list. (Go for the most straightforward choice, singly linked list, unless efficiently demands more complex structures.)
Exercise Complete the following table.
| Operation | How? | Runtime |
|---|---|---|
has | ||
insert | ||
remove | ||
size |
Solution
Except for size, all operations require a helper find method to check if an element exists. We cannot do better than Linear Search for find.
| Operation | How? | Runtime |
|---|---|---|
has | return find(t) != null; | $\Omicron(n)$ |
insert | if (find(t) == null), prepend(t); | $\Omicron(n)$ |
remove | remove(find(t)); | $\Omicron(n)$ |
size | return numElements; | $\Omicron(1)$ |
find | Linear search | $\Omicron(n)$ |
We can use a doubly linked list so once the "node to be removed" is found, we can remove it in constant time (we need access to the previous node). Or we can have a findPrevious method to get hold of the node before the one "to be removed" in a singly linked list, in linear time, and then remove the "next" node (the target node) in constant time.